Democrats present resolution to harass Trump until after he dies

Democrats present resolution to harass Trump until after he dies
Democrats claim to fight hatred as they pass hate-based legislation against Trump. (Archive)

The Democratic Party’s revenge on Donald Trump transcends life and death. After failing twice in a political trial against him, they intend to deny him the honors conferred on the ex-presidents upon death.

“No Glory for Hate Act (Law: there is no glory for hatred)”, is called the House Bill 484 of Representatives which was presented to Congress. The document outlines that federal funds would not be allowed to be used to:

«Create or display any symbol, monument, or statue commemorating any former president who has been indicted twice by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this act or who has been convicted of a state or federal crime related to actions Taken in an official capacity as President of the United States on federal public land, including any highway, park, subway, federal building, military facility, street, or other federal property.

According to the text of the bill, which you can see below, “any former president who has been indicted twice by the House of Representatives” could not be buried in Arlington National Cemetery, as is tradition.

Only former President Donald Trump has been indicted twice by the House. Both times he was acquitted in the Senate.

California Democratic Representative Linda Sánchez introduced the bill. The document was backed by 13 other Democratic lawmakers.

In a statement from Representative Sánchez, she said: “For years, Donald Trump poured gasoline on lies, fomenting racism and hatred, and then lit the match on January 6. A president who has been indicted twice does not deserve the honors accorded to a former president. We must never glorify the hatred that Donald Trump personified as president. This bill ensures that there is no glory for hatred, not a building, a statue or even a park bench.

READ  the UK opens while the EU evaluates other restrictions

On January 6, Trump called for peace, to stop violence, to obey the law and respect the security forces, emphasizing that his party, the Republican, is that of law and order. However, social networks instead of allowing that message to spread, denied all access to then-President Trump. Subsequently, he was banned from Twitter, Facebook, etc.

The hate speech narrative was imposed through censorship at the time. Now, the Democratic Party claims to defend citizens from hatred, while legislating based on their aversion to Trump.

The “No Glory to Hate Act” would also prohibit Trump from receiving a federal pension worth $ 220,000 a year, office space and paid staff.

Given that the Federal Constitution prohibits any punishment after conviction in a political trial in addition to removal and disqualification, this bill is perceived as a biased strategy, as well as unconstitutional.

However, it was already presented to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management on February 4 and is available at official website congressional.

Faced with this situation, the claim has arisen regarding the priorities of the Democrats in relation to the interests of the nation. This is because the US is the country with the most cases of coronavirus and an economic stoppage that has produced almost 800,000 cases of unemployment, according to details. Infobae.

Above all, it contradicts the speech of now president Joe Biden, who claimed that it is time for unity.

READ  ?? National disaster ??: this is how Trump viewed Biden's immigration policy

The bill says it rejects hatred. However, it seems that this is the prevailing sentiment to bury the legacy of the Republican, hatred against former President Trump.

Said Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, “I predict the future happiness of Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting people’s work under the guise of taking care of them.”

Appealing resources to profess hatred against a former president while claiming to protect citizens from hatred seems to be the opposite.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.