Meghan Markle boarded the Canadian seaplane to visit the women's refuge after fleeing the UK

Meghan Markle boarded the Canadian seaplane to visit the women's refuge after fleeing the UK

Meghan Markle broke the cover for the first time on Tuesday leaving the lavish $ 14 million Canadian home where she was locked up last week to visit a women’s refuge in Canada’s poorest neighborhood.

The Duchess of Sussex left the Vancouver ocean villa shortly before 10 am local time and arrived at Victoria Harbor airport about 20 minutes later, where she appeared happy and relaxed while laughing with her security team before boarding a seaplane. for the mainland.

She then made a surprise visit to Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside Women’s Center to “offer support” and “increase the staff spirit”.

A staff member said he only found out about the visit when Meghan arrived and spent time meeting with the managers.

The Duchess is believed to have visited the reception center. Provides advice, hot meals and basic needs for needy women and children.

‘He asked what women would need in terms of support. It was a pleasant meeting, “said the staff member.

It is not clear whether the Duchess is planning a long-standing association with the center.

A smiling Meghan Markle was spotted Tuesday leaving the $ 14 million Vancouver Island home where she and Prince Harry stayed on vacation with Archie. She has been in the villa for the past week, but Archie was nowhere to be seen on Tuesday

A smiling Meghan Markle was spotted Tuesday leaving the $ 14 million Vancouver Island home where she and Prince Harry stayed on vacation with Archie. She has been in the villa for the past week, but Archie was nowhere to be seen on Tuesday

The Duchess made a surprise visit to Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside Women’s Center to “offer support” and “increase the staff spirit”

The Duchess pulled a fur-lined hood over her head and put on knee-high brown boots as she climbed a small seaplane to head to the mainland.

The Duchess pulled a fur-lined hood over her head and put on knee-high brown boots as she climbed a small seaplane to head to the mainland.

The Duchess slipped a fur-lined hood over her head and put on knee-high brown boots as she climbed onto a small seaplane to head to the mainland. She was accompanied by members of her security details and did not appear to be taking luggage

This is the first sighting of the Duchess of Sussex since the news of “Megxit” came last week. She was seen boarding a small seaplane from Victoria Harbor airport to the mainland

Markle vs Markle: Meghan’s father will become the main witness against her in the High Court showdown

Thomas Markle, a stranger father of the Duchess of Sussex, is expected to be called a key defense witness in a court case that resulted in a newspaper.

Markle, 75, gave lawyers never-before-seen text messages sent during Meghan’s wedding to Prince Harry, revealing the breakdown of the father-daughter relationship.

Some of the messages were detailed yesterday in defense documents filed with the London High Court.

The documents say that after Mr. Markle sent messages to his daughter saying he could not come to his wedding because he had been rushed to the hospital for emergency heart surgery and was told not to fly for reasons of health, he received a message that appeared to be from Prince Harry.

The message warned him, accused him of hurting his daughter and didn’t ask him about his health. He left Markle “deeply injured”.

In return, Markle wrote, “I did nothing to hurt Meghan or anyone else … I’m sorry that my heart attack is … some inconvenience to you.”

The Duchess of Sussex filed a lawsuit against Swiss Post last Sunday after publishing extracts from a letter she had written to her father in August 2018.

Meghan, 38, accused the newspaper – the sister newspaper of the Daily Mail – of violating her privacy, data protection rights and copyright when she published extracts.

The MoS filed his defense to his case at the London High Court yesterday. He denied his claims and argued that there was a “huge and legitimate public interest” in the Royal Family, including his “personal and family relationships”.

Scroll down for the full story.

The women’s refuge is located in one of Canada’s poorest neighborhoods, Eastside, Vancouver. It is the epicenter of the country’s drug overdose crisis that has caused over 13,000 victims since January 2016

Archie, the eight-month-old son, was nowhere to be seen, and Meghan, accompanied by members of her security details, did not appear to carry her bags with her while flying to Vancouver.

Meghan pulled a fur-lined hood over her head and put on knee-high brown boots to protect herself from the gusts of snow as she boarded the plane.

It is the first time that she has been spotted positively since returning to British Columbia last week, although there has been unconfirmed news of her driving to the nearby city of Sidney by the Sea and Victoria International Airport.

He moved as the Canadian Navy moored a ship a quarter of a mile from the sea off Mille Fleurs, the home where his family spent the holidays and where he had been staying since he left London quickly.

Coastal defense vessel Brandon settled in Patricia Bay on Monday.

But Canadian Navy spokesman Lt. Chelsea Dubeau said the mooring near Meghan’s temporary home was a “coincidence”, and Brandon, he said, was in the midst of sea trials.

“Sometimes during sea trials they dock to conduct exercises on board, on board or around the ship,” Dubeau told DailyMail.com.

The Duchess decided to recycle her wardrobe, wearing a $ 399 Barbour coat, first worn by her in March 2017 and paired with a $ 195 Cuyana bag she wore at Wimbledon in June 2019. She wore Le Chameau boots at detail for $ 493.36.

Meghan has been locked up in Mille Fleurs since Friday after leaving her husband Prince Harry in Britain to work out terms for the couple leaving senior members of the royal family.

She expected to telephone the discussions between Harry, the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William on Monday, but eventually left everything to her husband to finalize the details.

Harry is expected to return to Canada – where the couple stayed for six weeks in December and the new year – later this week, when the couple begin their new life. His last real duty will be to appear in the Rugby League World Cup draw at Buckingham Palace on Thursday.

Today the Duchess of Sussex denied having been banned from “dialing” at the Sandringham summit from Canada, while the royal royalty discussed her abandonment from the Royal Family with Prince Harry.

The Duchess decided to recycle her wardrobe, wearing a $ 399 Barbour coat, first worn by her in March 2017 and paired with a $ 195 Cuyana bag that she wore at Wimbledon in June 2019. She wore Le Chameau boots retails for $ 493.36

Meghan held down the hood of her $ 399 Barbour coat to protect herself from the snow as she headed for the plane

The Duchess decided to recycle her wardrobe, wearing a $ 399 Barbour coat, first worn by her in March 2017 and paired with a $ 195 Cuyana bag that she wore at Wimbledon in June 2019. She wore Le Chameau boots retails for $ 493.36

Meghan was supposed to telephone the discussions between Harry, the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William on Monday, but ultimately left everything to her husband to finalize the details

Meghan was supposed to telephone the discussions between Harry, the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William on Monday, but ultimately left everything to her husband to finalize the details

The Duchess hurried 22 miles from the Vancouver Island seaside villa to Victoria Harbor airport where she boarded a Whistler Air seaplane to the mainland

The Duchess hurried 22 miles from the Vancouver Island seaside villa to Victoria Harbor airport where she boarded a Whistler Air seaplane to the mainland

Meghan returned to Canada after only three days in the UK to reunite with Archie, who left in the care of a nanny and best friend Jessica Mulroney

Meghan returned to Canada after only three days in the UK to reunite with Archie, who left in the care of a nanny and best friend Jessica Mulroney

The spokesman for the couple Kensington Palace insisted that Meghan had not been excluded from the discussion and left her to her husband, saying: “In the end, the Sussex decided that it was not necessary for the Duchess to join.”

It comes as the Sussex team continues to negotiate an abdication agreement on money, securities and establish their own international trademark.

Meanwhile, it has also been revealed that the queen has allowed Harry and Meghan to leave the role of royal royalty following a private confrontation with her nephew at yesterday’s crisis summit.

After a family gathering in Sandringham, His Majesty issued a historic and emotionally charged statement that regrets the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s decision to divide their time between Canada and the UK as they finish their royal duties. .

Meghan looked relaxed and happy as she walked to the plane that had other paying customers on board

Meghan looked relaxed and happy as she walked to the plane that had other paying customers on board

Meghan looked relaxed while chatting with a staff member while walking towards the plane

Meghan boarded a plane that appeared to have other paying customers on board

It is the first time Meghan has been spotted positively since returning to British Columbia last week by plane, although there has been unconfirmed news of her driving to the nearby city of Sidney by the Sea and Victoria International Airport.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent their first Christmas with little Archie at Mille Fleurs, a $ 14.1 million waterfront mansion near Victoria in British Columbia. It has remained there since it left the UK last week

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent their first Christmas with little Archie at Mille Fleurs, a $ 14.1 million waterfront mansion near Victoria in British Columbia. It has remained there since it left the UK last week

The moored ship of the Canadian Navy HMCS Brandon just a quarter mile from the sea, which belongs to a mysterious billionaire who refuses to be identified

The moored ship of the Canadian Navy HMCS Brandon just a quarter mile from the sea, which belongs to a mysterious billionaire who refuses to be identified

Coastal defense vessel Brandon moved to Patricia Bay on Monday, near the house where Meghan has been staying since she left the UK last week

Coastal defense vessel Brandon moved to Patricia Bay on Monday, near the house where Meghan has been staying since she left the UK last week

The property, located on the 830,000-square-foot Île Gagnon in the Milles Îles River, was built in 2001 and was the conjugal home of Dion and her late husband René Angélil

Prince Harry is expected to return to Canada later this week when the couple begin their new life after his talks with the queen to negotiate the terms of their new roles within the royal family.

The Mille Fleurs property, which is hidden from view on a promontory overlooking Patricia’s bay, is still clouded by mystery.

Five neighbors, a former colleague of the real estate agent who last sold the building, and a friend of the former owner told DailyMail.com that the current owner is a Russian businessman. Some said he is a billionaire.

Meghan and Harry were introduced to the mystery owner by David Foster, a friend of the owner. Foster’s wife Katherine McPhee was a school friend of the Duchess of Sussex.

And the multimillionaire also refused to voluntarily identify himself in view of the new legislation in the Canadian province which will make it mandatory to publicly appoint property owners.

The queen (pictured attending Sandringham church on Sunday) made clear her profound disappointment at Harry and Meghan's decision to stop in a statement released yesterday

The queen (pictured attending Sandringham church on Sunday) made clear her profound disappointment at Harry and Meghan’s decision to stop in a statement released yesterday

The Queen's statement in full Monday evening after a day of reckoning speaks to decide the future of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

The Queen’s statement in full Monday evening after a day of reckoning speaks to decide the future of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge together with Prince George and Princess Charlotte boarded a similar seaplane during their Royal Tour of Canada in 2016

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge together with Prince George and Princess Charlotte boarded a similar seaplane during their Royal Tour of Canada in 2016

Prince William, Catherine, a young Prince George and Princess Charlotte were pictured in Victoria Harbor in 2016 while walking along the same ramp as Meghan Markle pictured on Tuesday

Prince William, Catherine, a young Prince George and Princess Charlotte were pictured in Victoria Harbor in 2016 while walking along the same ramp as Meghan Markle pictured on Tuesday

A realtor involved in selling the house in 2014 said it was bought by a billionaire who is neither Canadian nor American for $ 18 million CAD – $ 14 million. The buyer’s identity was subject to a non-disclosure agreement, said the real estate agent, who declined to be named.

The association of the royal couple with a multimillionaire – or perhaps even a Russian billionaire – who masks his identity comes when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex apparently find themselves at war with their family over their decision to move to North America and “move to financial independence.

An association with someone who does everything to hide their identity will raise questions about the judgment as they pursue opportunities in an attempt to “work towards financial independence”.

Markle vs Markle: Meghan’s father will be the main witness against her in the High Court showdown as devastating messages expose their bitter war of words about her marriage

Thomas Markle is ready to provide evidence against his daughter in an extraordinary court case, it was revealed yesterday.

The stranger father of the Duchess of Sussex should be called as a key defense witness in a court case that resulted in a newspaper.

Markle, 75, gave lawyers never-before-seen text messages sent during Meghan’s wedding to Prince Harry, revealing the breakdown of the father-daughter relationship.

Some of the messages were detailed yesterday in defense documents filed with the London High Court.

The documents say that after Mr. Markle sent messages to his daughter saying he could not come to his wedding because he had been rushed to the hospital for emergency heart surgery and was told not to fly for reasons of health, he received a message that appeared to be from Prince Harry.

The message warned him, accused him of hurting his daughter and didn’t ask him about his health. He left Markle “deeply injured”.

In return, Markle wrote, “I did nothing to hurt Meghan or anyone else … I’m sorry that my heart attack is … some inconvenience to you.”

The stranger father of the Duchess of Sussex should be called as a key defense witness in a court case that led to a newspaper (photo: Meghan Markle as a young man, with his father Thomas Markle)

The stranger father of the Duchess of Sussex should be called as a key defense witness in a court case that led to a newspaper (photo: Meghan Markle as a young man, with his father Thomas Markle)

The Duchess of Sussex filed a lawsuit against Swiss Post last Sunday after publishing extracts from a letter she had written to her father in August 2018.

Meghan, 38, accused the newspaper – the sister newspaper of the Daily Mail – of violating her privacy, data protection rights and copyright when she published extracts.

The MoS filed his defense to his case at the London High Court yesterday. He denied his claims and argued that there was a “huge and legitimate public interest” in the Royal Family, including his “personal and family relationships”.

Defense documents also said:

  • Thomas Markle released Meghan’s letter to the world only to show that it was not the “loving” motif his friends had expressed;
  • He had kept his handwritten note private for months and revealed it only to expose “false” claims that the Duchess had tried to repair their relationship;
  • She decided to release extracts from the letter to the press only after she had allowed her friends to talk about it first in the American magazine People;
  • That of Meghan’s best friends, Jessica Mulroney, once intervened to try and fix a “favorable” press article for the Duchess;
  • Markle insisted that she made multiple attempts to contact her daughter by phone and SMS, but received no response;
  • Aside from the August 2018 letter, Markle hadn’t heard from her since telling her he was too sick to attend her wedding. Prince Harry had never been introduced to her husband, nor had she met her eight-month-old nephew Archie.

The latest development in the court case came in a turbulent week that saw the Queen’s crisis keep talking about Meghan and Harry’s role in the royal family after they announced their desire to withdraw from their royal duties.

The Duchess was photographed last night in Canada for the first time since she returned there after the bomb’s “Megxit” statement. She was seen boarding a seaplane from Vancouver Island that appeared to be headed for the Whistler ski resort.

Meghan started her lawsuit against the Ministry last year after she published excerpts from her letter to her father. Markle handed the letter to the newspaper after the Duchess’ unnamed friends told People magazine that they wrote the “loving” letter in an attempt to repair their relationship.

The newspaper’s attorneys claimed that Meghan had “knowingly” allowed her friends to disclose the details of the letter to the magazine – in fact, which had contributed to violating their privacy.

If the case is presented to a judge, the newspaper claims that it will ask Meghan to be forced to deliver all communications in which she caused or allowed her friends to provide information about her to the media or to try to influence what is published. her’.

This could lead to the prospect that Meghan is face to face with her father in the High Court.

Markle, a retired Hollywood lights director who lives in Rosarito, Mexico, said his daughter broke all contact with him after his wedding, except for the letter in the center of the case.

If he had been called as a witness, he would have actually branded his daughter a liar who had invaded his privacy. The Sussex said they will privately fund the lawsuits.

Meghan’s wedding week war with her father: court documents reveal bitter messages that destroyed their relationship

The devastating breakdown of Meghan Markle’s relationship with her father was laid bare yesterday in a series of messages between the couple detailed by the court documents.

He delivered never-before-seen messages and letters explaining how he made desperate attempts to repair their relationship after heart surgery forced him to lose his marriage.

In a message he accused Prince Harry of treating his heart attack as an “inconvenience”, adding: “I did nothing to hurt you, Meghan or anyone else.”

In another, he said that Meghan had actually “canceled” me. The exchanges between Markle and her daughter were detailed in documents filed yesterday at the London High Court.

In a message Thomas Markle accused Prince Harry of treating his heart attack as an “inconvenience”, adding: “I did nothing to hurt you, Meghan or anyone else.” (pictured: a young Meghan Markle with her father Thomas)

The Duchess of Sussex filed a lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday, the sister newspaper of the Daily Mail, accusing the newspaper of violating her privacy and copyright by publishing excerpts from a five-page letter she wrote to her father in August 2018. Letter, Meghan, 38, chastised his father for ignoring his calls and said he had “broken his heart into a million pieces.”

Meghan’s legal team said she was “shocked and deeply troubled” when her “private letter” was released to her father.

The documents filed in court yesterday describe in detail the defense of the newspaper against its accusations. They say 75-year-old Markle never met his eight-month-old grandson Archie, nor was he introduced to Prince Harry, although they spoke on the phone.

Her only contact with her daughter since her wedding day was the August 2018 letter, in which she accused him of lying about her and inflicting “unnecessary and unjustified pain” on her and her new husband.

As part of the lawsuit, Markle agreed to appear as the newspaper’s key witness if the case were to appear before a judge later this year.

He handed over his medical records and correspondence with Meghan, which reveals how their relationship ended in the last fifteen days before his wedding.

According to messages detailed in yesterday’s defense documents, Thomas Markle initially sent touching messages to his daughter, who spoke of his excitement over his impending marriage – before he told of his devastation when a heart attack forced him to abandon plans to accompany her down the hall. In the messages, he repeatedly told Meghan to love her.

Meghan and Prince Harry on their wedding day in St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle on May 19th 2018

Meghan and Prince Harry on their wedding day in St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle on May 19th 2018

But the messages clarified how their relationship started to break after it was revealed that he had secretly agreed to stage a series of paparazzi-style photos of himself preparing for the wedding.

In documents filed with the High Court, defense lawyers claimed that Meghan had shown contempt for her father’s well-being. They said that even after explaining his heart condition and that the doctors said he couldn’t fly, he was getting a warning from Harry.

He did not make it clear that he was forced to abandon plans to attend her wedding because of her ill health, and then ignored her repeated attempts to contact her after the wedding, they said.

Sunday post attorneys told the court, “If the applicant [the Duchess of Sussex] she had been or was worried about her father and her well-being, she would not cut her father, a 75-year-old man who was sick, out of her life for the perceived sin of speaking to the press about her daughter who had become a famous royal duchess. “

May 10, 2018

According to defense documents, Markle wrote a message to her daughter saying she had left some flowers at her mother’s house for Mother’s Day. In a poignant message, she told Meghan that she was excited to try on some shoes she had bought for him to wear for her wedding. He had also bought him a new suit.

He finished the text with a touching message that it was “past his bedtime” because of the time difference, adding: “I love you”. He wrote: ‘I can’t wait to try on my shoes and see how we thank you for preparing it for me, it is [sic] probably after sleeping, so good night, I love you dad. “

May 11 or 12

News is arriving that Markle had secretly agreed with a photographer to stage a series of paparazzi-style photos – despite Prince Harry’s requests for the media to leave only his future father-in-law. At the time, it was reported that CCTV had surprised him while posing in an internet café for photographs that showed him watching a news story about his daughter’s love affair with the prince.

Kensington Palace had previously issued a warning to publishers to respect his privacy, saying he had been “harassed” by paparazzi. A letter from Prince Harry Jason Knauf’s secretary of communications stated that he had been followed and urged the editors not to publish his photos. But the Mail on Sunday revealed that a series of photographs were taken with his collaboration in March. Mr Markle, Meghan and Harry spoke on the phone before the story opened.

Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex watch an air parade to celebrate the centenary of the Royal Air Force from the balcony of Buckingham Palace on 10 July 2018

Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex watch an air parade to celebrate the centenary of the Royal Air Force from the balcony of Buckingham Palace on 10 July 2018

May 14

Kensington Palace issued a statement confirming that Mr. Markle would not be attending the wedding. He said: ‘This is a deeply personal moment for Mrs. Markle in the days leading up to her wedding. She and Prince Harry again ask for understanding and respect to be extended to Mr Markle in this difficult situation. “

Defense documents say that Markle wrote to her daughter that day to apologize for the fury of the photographs placed and offered to make a public apology to both Meghan and Prince Harry. He said he loved her, but he wouldn’t go to his wedding because he wanted to spare her from further embarrassments.

Prince Harry sent him a message in reply, saying that he didn’t need to apologize and that he should call them. Later that day, Markle suffered from chest pain and shortness of breath and was taken to the hospital and diagnosed with suspected congestive heart failure.

The following day, defense documents say Markle wrote to Meghan to say that he had returned to the hospital and she replied, asking him to call her.

May 16

Mr. Markle underwent an emergency operation: an angioplasty to unblock two arteries in his heart.

Defense documents say he sent a message to Meghan that day to tell her about the surgery and said he could not attend the wedding because his doctors would not allow him to fly. He apologized for losing the wedding and said that he loved her, and wished her the best, saying that he had undergone surgery.

According to defense documents, she sent a subsequent message, asking who would accompany her down the corridor to give her away, and said she would come if she really needed him. He apologized again for not being there. He told Meghan that he loved her and wishes her the best.

In response, he received a text message which he believed was from Prince Harry, which he described as harmful.

According to the legal documents filed yesterday at the High Court, “Love M and H” was signed, but he did not ask for his emergency heart intervention, nor asked him how he felt. Instead, she accused him of ignoring around 20 calls from Meghan.

The courtroom articles said of Thomas Markle: “He received a text response signed” Love M and H “, but he read it as if it were Prince Harry’s, (among other things) warning Mr. Markle for talking to the press and telling him to stop and accuse Mr. Markle of hurting his daughter.

Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, leave after visiting Canada House in London after their recent stay in Canada on January 7

Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, leave after visiting Canada House in London after their recent stay in Canada on January 7

“The text didn’t ask how the surgical procedure had gone or how Mr. Markle was or sent him best wishes.” Markle was said to be “deeply injured” by the tone of the message and replied abruptly.

According to defense documents, he said: ‘I haven’t done anything to hurt you Meghan or anyone else I don’t know anything about 20 phone calls. I’m sorry that my heart attack is … any inconvenience for you. “Court documents say he hasn’t received a response and that his daughter hasn’t spoken to him in the last days before her wedding.

In the letter that Meghan later wrote to her father in August 2018, which was published in the Mail on Sunday, she wrote: “You told the press that you called me to say that you won’t come to the wedding – it didn’t happen because you didn’t have you ever called.

He accused him of ignoring his attempts to contact him in the days leading up to the wedding, saying: ‘Just from my phone, I called you over 20 times and you ignored my calls … leaving me in the days before our worried wedding , confused, shocked and absolutely blind. “

May 17

Kensington Palace has released a statement from Meghan, saying: ‘Unfortunately, my father will not be attending our wedding.

‘I have always taken care of my father and I hope he can have the space he needs to focus on his health. I’d like to thank everyone who offered generous support messages. Please know how much Harry and I look forward to sharing our special day with you on Saturday. “

In a statement the following day, Kensington Palace said that Meghan had asked Prince Charles to accompany her down the corridor to her wedding. It did not refer to his father or his hospital care.

May 19 – wedding day

Meghan Markle married Prince Harry and formally joined the royal family.

Her mother Doria was at her side and Prince Charles followed her down the corridor.

The defense documents filed yesterday claimed that Markle had insisted that he had repeatedly attempted to contact his daughter by phone and SMS, but had received no response.

When he tried to call, he said that his calls were blocked and that he believed he had changed his number without telling him.

Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex arrive at the public walkabout at the Rotorua government gardens on October 31, 2018 in Rotorua, New Zealand

Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex arrive at the public walkabout at the Rotorua government gardens on October 31, 2018 in Rotorua, New Zealand

Markle said he had no communications from Meghan until his August letter three months later. Aside from that single letter, defense documents stated that he hadn’t heard from his daughter since he told her he was too sick to attend his wedding. Prince Harry had never been introduced to her husband, nor had she met her eight-month-old nephew Archie.

He kept trying to get in touch, and texted her in November 2018, according to defense documents. The message read: ‘I want to contact you or try to contact you once again.

“Apparently you just canceled me and now you’re telling me I believe for the rest of my life?” There was no response, the legal documents say.

Thomas Markle “delivered Meghan’s letter to the Mail on Sunday after allowing friends to make false statements about their relationship with the American magazine”

by Sam Greenhill for the Daily Mail

Thomas Markle released a letter from his daughter Meghan to the world to show that it was not the “loving” reason his friends had expressed, court documents reported yesterday.

He kept his handwritten note private for months and only revealed it to expose “false” claims that the Duchess had tried to repair their relationship.

The letter – from August 2018 in the wake of his marriage to Prince Harry – was an “attack” on Mr Markle and signaled the “end of the relationship” between father and daughter, court documents said.

According to defense documents filed yesterday at the High Court on behalf of The Mail on Sunday, the stranger’s father of the Duchess of Sussex decided to release extracts from the letter to the Press only after allowing her friends to talk about it first.

Thomas Markle kept his handwritten note private for months and only revealed that he exposed “false” claims that the Duchess had tried to repair their relationship (pictured: a young Meghan with her father)

The newspaper’s documents claimed that Meghan “knowingly” allowed her friends to reveal the details of the letter to the media. He “induced or allowed” five close friends to speak anonymously to the American magazine People to attack Thomas Markle, according to court documents.

The result was an interview with a bomb published on February 6, 2019, in the celebrity weekly titled: “His best friends break the silence” and “The truth about Meghan”.

He cited the Duchess of Sussex’s friends saying he had written a passionate appeal to his stranger father to stop “victimizing” her in the media. They said she had been so shocked by her repeated public attacks on her and Prince Harry that she had sent him the letter begging him to resolve their differences privately.

People’s interview said that Meghan had written to Markle: “Dad, I’m heartbroken, I love you, I have a father. Please stop victimizing me through the media so we can repair our relationship.”

But this article provided a “one-sided” and “untrue” account of the situation and its letter, yesterday’s defense documents said.

Far from being “a loving letter to repair their relationship … his letter was an attack on Mr. Markle. Among other things, he accused him of breaking his heart, causing pain, being paranoid, being ridiculed, making stories, attack Prince Harry and lie constantly. ‘

Among the false claims, it was wrongly claimed that Mr. Markle refused to drive to the airport to attend the royal wedding, according to court documents.

The People’s Interview also stated that Markle had “never called … never sent messages” and that she had mistakenly claimed that she could not reach her daughter. This was, according to Mail on Sunday’s defense, untrue.

After the wedding, Markle had attempted to contact Meghan by phone and SMS, but had not received an answer until the letter.

“Except for the receipt of the letter, Markle hadn’t heard from her daughter since writing to tell her he was too ill to attend her wedding, nor was Prince Harry or their son, his grandson ever presented or met. , “said the defense document.

Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex participate in the church service on Christmas day in Sandringham in 2018

Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex participate in the church service on Christmas day in Sandringham in 2018

Markle therefore had the right to make it clear by allowing the British newspaper to publish excerpts from the letter four days later, the defense document said, adding that he had released it “in direct response to the publication of the popular interview”. It said: ‘Thomas Markle had the heavy right to tell his version of what had happened between him and his daughter, including the contents of the letter. He didn’t suggest that they try to fix their relationship.

“On the contrary, the last words of the letter,” I ask for nothing but peace, and I want the same for you “suggested that their relationship was over, and Mr. Markle understood those words to signal the end of the relationship. ‘

The judicial process insisted that the Duchess of Sussex never denied giving her consent to the five sources of People magazine, described by the weekly – which has 40 million readers in the United States alone – as an “intensely circle loyal to close friends. ” The defense document stated that Meghan “consciously caused or allowed information” about her relationship with her father and a description of the contents of the letter to enter the public domain.

The meaning and effect of the “one-sided and / or misleading story in the People” was to suggest that Markle had made false claims about her relationship with her daughter. “

The defense of Mail on Sunday also said: “The People’s interview stated that Markle had responded to the letter with a letter in which he had asked for a” photo op “with [Meghan], with the implicit suggestion that he was trying to make money with a photograph of him [her]. This was untrue.

“Mr. Markle had indeed written,” I wish we could be together and take a picture that the whole world could see. If you don’t like me and Harry? Get over for a photo and maybe some of the press will shut up in the end! ‘. None of Markle’s reports of events or feelings related to those events were mentioned in the People interview. “

Defense attorneys said that from the clear handwriting and immaculate presentation of Meghan’s letter it was clear that she had expected it to be read by others or disclosed to the media.

Meghan Markle’s closest confidante, Jessica Mulroney, “tried to fix a press article” for the Duchess

by Sam Greenhill for the Daily Mail

One of Meghan’s best friends once intervened to try and fix a “favorable” press article for the Duchess of Sussex, it was said.

Canadian stylist Jessica Mulroney tried to “influence” an interview that former Meghan adviser Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne released the Mail on Sunday.

The claim is part of the newspaper’s case that the Duchess was very skilled in the art of trying to manipulate what had been written about her.

She complained that her father allowed parts of a letter she wrote to him to be published in the Sunday post.

Jessica Mulroney and actress Meghan Markle attends the Instagram dinner held at the MARS Discovery District on May 31, 2016 in Toronto, Canada

Jessica Mulroney and actress Meghan Markle attends the Instagram dinner held at the MARS Discovery District on May 31, 2016 in Toronto, Canada

But the newspaper says Thomas Markle did it only after Meghan colluded in an article with People magazine. Mrs. Mulroney’s intervention was given as an example of Meghan using friends to influence what has been written about her.

The Duchess and her style guru are said to have been in contact after Kensington Palace was informed Sunday by the Mail about her interview with Mrs. Nelthorpe-Cowne, a former friend and adviser.

Court documents say that Meghan “caused or allowed a close friend to try to influence what is published about her in the media.” They said that Ms. Mulroney tried to intervene in connection with the interview.

A journalist from Mail on Sunday had communicated the contents of the story to the Palazzo. The newspaper’s attorneys suggest that Meghan then passed on this message to Ms. Mulroney “with a request to speak to try to ensure the publication of a more favorable article.”

Later that day – April 7, 2018 – Ms Mulroney wrote to Ms Nelthorpe-Cowne “putting pressure on her to withdraw or amend the statements,” it was said.

Defense attorneys said they would seek “disclosure” of all of Meghan’s communications relating to this intervention and of any other occasions when she had allowed her friends to provide information to the media to influence what was published about her. .

Ms. Mulroney, the daughter-in-law of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, met Meghan while working on the television drama Suits. Known as “Toronto’s answer to Gwyneth Paltrow”, she is a social media star and is married to a friend of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

The Duchess and her style guru are said to have been in contact after Kensington Palace was informed on Sunday by the Mail about her interview with Mrs. Nelthorpe-Cowne (pictured), a former friend and adviser.

The Duchess and her style guru are said to have been in contact after Kensington Palace was informed on Sunday by the Mail about her interview with Mrs. Nelthorpe-Cowne (pictured), a former friend and adviser.

The real reason for Megxit? There is “bad blood” in the Studio and the divisions have spread more widely than the princes William and Harry, friends say

by Rebecca English, royal correspondent of The Daily Mail

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex felt that they had to withdraw from their official roles because of “bad blood” in the royal family, as claimed yesterday.

A friend of the couple said their decision to step down when senior royalty became “inevitable” when they felt increasingly ostracized.

The source spoke to U.S. People magazine, which previously told a story in defense of Meghan, who reportedly came from five of his close friends.

“That’s not how they wanted to handle it, but Meghan and Harry’s hand was forced,” a friend said in the magazine stating yesterday.

“There is so much bad blood in that family – it’s toxic.”

The source added: “If the relationships had been better, things would have been different.”

The friend credits the claim that Harry (center right) was offended by his older brother Prince William (center left with his wife Kate) warning him to move too quickly in his relationship with actress Meghan (a right)

The friend credits the claim that Harry (center right) was offended by his older brother Prince William (center left with his wife Kate) warning him to move too quickly in his relationship with actress Meghan (a right)

The friend credits the claim that Harry was offended by his older brother, Prince William, warning him to move too quickly in his relationship with actress Meghan.

They say the Duchess was also injured by the “negative press” and that she considered her “outsider status as a bi-racial American”.

The source added: ‘Meghan and Harry didn’t feel they had enough comfort or comfort from them [the royals]. ‘

He came while the palace aides were closed in meetings yesterday, detonating the details of Harry and Meghan’s “exit package” from the Royal Family.

Members of the three main royal families – Buckingham Palace, Clarence House and Kensington Palace – in addition to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s private office, are attempting to present a proposal that will satisfy the couple by the end of the week, if possible.

Following Monday’s historic Sandringham summit, the queen, who has been seriously injured by recent events, released a statement capitulating to her nephew’s requests to allow him and Meghan to resign as royal royalty.

She made it clear that she, Prince Charles and William would have preferred that they stay.

But given the couple’s sentimental strength to be allowed to carve out a “financially independent” life, although it retains many of their royal privileges, the Queen agreed to allow the couple to split their time between Canada and the UK and asked the staff to work “at the rhythm” to resolve the situation.

Among the parties involved are the four main private secretaries (also known as staff chiefs): Sir Edward Young for the Queen; Clive Alderton for Charles; Simon Case for William; and Harry’s new date, Fiona Mcilwham.

The biggest obstacles, insiders say, are financing, residency, security and how the couple plans to make a living.

The aides are eager to try to limit any attempt by Harry and Meghan to commercialize the monarchy.

Brand experts say the couple’s stellar power could see them earn £ 400 million in the coming years.

The aides were instructed not to talk about the discussions, but broke their Purdah to confirm the Daily Mail story yesterday that Meghan did not attend the Sandringham summit as expected.

Over the weekend, the aides said he was likely to “call” from Canada to take part.

But yesterday they released a short statement saying “The Sussex decided that the Duchess did not need to join.”

Mail was told that the decision was made because of security concerns over who could hear the call.

It is also understood that the Sussex feel disappointed by the wider “institution” of the monarchy, as opposed to the much-discussed rift between Harry and William.

A source said: ‘It’s bigger than any problem with an individual, it’s about feeling disappointed by the institution and surrounding structure.

‘They want to carve out a new model. It is much bigger and more complex than dating a particular person. ‘

Today William and Kate will be seen in public together for the first time since the real crisis broke out as they visit a variety of community projects in Bradford.

Harry will face Buckingham Palace tomorrow in front of the world press as he takes part in the official draw for the Rugby League World Cup, which will be hosted in the UK next year.

It will be his last engagement as an elder member of the royal family – and may be his last ever on behalf of the queen if his request to take on occasional assignments on his behalf while pursuing commercial efforts is not allowed.

.

Leave a comment

Send a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.