Meghan Markle broke his silence after declaring the victory in his battle against the British newspaper Mail on Sunday for invading her privacy by posting a letter she wrote to her father. “After two long years of litigation, I am grateful to the courts for holding Associated Newspapers and The Mail on Sunday accountable for their illegal and dehumanizing practices,” she said. the duchess of sussex years in a statement.
These tactics (and those of its sister publications MailOnline and Daily Mail) are not new; in fact, they have been happening for a long time with no consequences, ”he shared. «For these media, it is a game. For me and many others, it is real life, real relationships and a very real sadness. The damage they have done and continue to do is profound, “he added. “The world needs high-quality, fact-verified, reliable news,” Markle continued.
“What The Mail on Sunday and its associated publications do is the opposite. We all lose when misinformation outsells the truth, when moral exploitation outsells decency, and when companies create their business model to profit from people’s pain. But today, with this comprehensive victory in both privacy and copyright, we have all won. We now know, and we hope it sets a legal precedent, that you cannot take someone’s privacy and exploit it, as the defendant has blatantly done in the last two years, “he said.
“We deserve justice and truth”
“I share this victory with each one of you, because we all deserve justice and truth, and we all deserve better,” he emphasized. “I want to particularly thank my husband, my mother and legal team, and especially Jenny Afia for her tireless support throughout this process,” the Duchess concluded in her statement. Judge Mark Warby noted that Associated Newspapers misused Markle’s private information in five February 2019 articles, publishing parts of a letter written to Thomas Markle, after his royal wedding to Prince in 2018. Harry.
The judge also noted that the Duchess had a reasonable expectation that the content of the letter would be kept private. The articles in the Mail interfered with that expectation. The ruling is a significant victory for the Duchess, who sued the publisher for invasion of privacy and copyright infringement. Associated Newspapers disputed the claim, and a trial was scheduled for the fall. The duchess requested a summary judgment to resolve the case without trial.