New Brexit negotiations with the EU: High level of acting

In the Brexit negotiations, the climax comes at the end. It is a production with distributed roles.

Brexit opponents demonstrate in London during negotiations on Friday Foto: Henry Nicholls/reuters

How often has you heard it: “Time is of the essence” is always emphasized when a new round of Brexit negotiations begins. But it is already clear that there will be no “breakthrough” this week either.

The Brexit negotiations follow the classic rules of diplomacy: the climax comes at the end. It would be detrimental for all sides to come to an agreement now – although the final Brexit is due at the end of the year. Voters would believe that their governments did not fight hard enough. There must be drama. Negotiations are expected to run until just before New Year’s Eve, garnished with night sessions, and the EU Parliament will be torn from the Christmas break to ratify the treaty at the last minute.

The content fronts have been fixed for months. It is about three issues: fishing rights, “fair competition” and how disputes are resolved. An agreement is likely on the last subject, as various arbitration procedures could be envisaged.

The crux of the matter is fair competition: The EU must prevent Great Britain from gaining export advantages by fraudulent practice by tax dumping or subsidizing companies. The British have to obey the rules – what Brexit fans don’t see is their motto “Take Back Control”.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson can therefore only accommodate the EU if he has a triumph to show. So the EU pumps up the issue of fishing rights – although almost no one lives from fishing. Johnson is said to be able to claim that he personally saved the British fishing fleet.

The fact that French President Macron pretends to be the chairman of the Normandy fishermen’s association and is completely uncompromising goes well with this EU staging. The brighter the “victory” of the British will shine. For Macron and his fishermen, a few EU billions are likely to fall off to sweeten their “defeat”. Nice too.

But who knows. The future is fundamentally uncertain, as a famous Brit named Keynes once stated.

.

St. Martin’s procession is not canceled in the newspaper

Weinheim. This year, large Martins parades are not allowed to take place. But they are still not in the newspapers. Some WN readers have already announced that they want to run the street lamp privately with their children. Because one thing remains a great thing even in Corona times: to make a beautiful lantern together and then proudly carry it in front of you with a candle or an electric light, sing a song and at the end have a little St.

The editorial team is therefore looking for the most beautiful lantern pictures that we will print in the newspaper over the weekend. The photos (please in JPG format) can be sent by email to: wn@diesbachmedien.de or to: oz@diesbachmedien.de – the deadline is November 11th. Of course, whatever you like is allowed: Star Wars lanterns or owls, a dinosaur or glittering fairy dust as decoration – there are no limits to the imagination.

.

The truth: flying barnacles – taz.de

Animals know no borders! Especially not geese. Not even the pious barnacle geese, they just fly in from Greenland.

Now they are attacking Islay again. Tens of thousands of barnacle geese and white-tailed geese fly in from Greenland every October to winter in the nature reserve of the Scottish Hebridean island. Bird lovers always get damp panties when the squadron approaches. The poultry is a nightmare for the farmers, because the geese plunder the fields.

Because the government has to pay the farmers a million pounds a year in compensation, it wants to contain the damage and has hired three snipers. Every winter they shoot around 3,000 barnacle geese, which are protected species, but the white-tailed geese are even more worthy of protection and must be spared. The barnacle geese take advantage of this. They mingle with the white-tailed geese and use them as a shield, as al-Qaeda did with the civilian population.

The aim of the “Islay strategy of sustainable goose management”, as goose slaughter is officially called, is to find a balance between the interests of the geese and the farmers. That the farmers survive is also in the interests of the geese, because without farmers there are no fields to plunder. It is a semantic masterpiece to depict the shooting of a protected animal species in a nature reserve as a blessing for the victims.

Speaking of semantics: the black and white barnacle geese have the same coloration as barnacles. The Catholics therefore claim that the geese are flying barnacles and can be eaten during Lent because they are not meat.

Greenland risk area

Now the geese face another danger. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has declared Greenland a risk area. Anyone entering from there must be in quarantine for two weeks. This also applies to geese, says Johnson. If the sociable animals don’t keep the distance rule, they just have to be expelled.

Apparently Johnson wants to use the geese as leverage: He is aiming for a free trade agreement with Greenland. The island left the EU in 1985, which was then called the EEC. Gröxit is the model for Brexit. At that time Greenland negotiated an association agreement and is considered an overseas territory of the EU. Johnson wants to unite Great Britain with Greenland and thereby benefit from the contract.

His advisors, however, believe he has gone crazy – apparently the aftermath of his corona infection from spring. He has made more than a dozen U-turns since then. Sometimes he likes strawberries with whipped cream, sometimes he detests them. Sometimes he wants an agreement with the EU, sometimes a hard Brexit. His offer to Greenland to allow the geese to enter the country in return for the merger with Great Britain should be treated with caution, even if he claims that he is “fit as a butcher’s dog”. A butcher dog is fat, voracious, and numb.

The truth on taz.de

.

Austro star on Netflix shoot: “Once it was close” – Tv

The Austrian actor Laurence Rupp plays the leading role in the Netflix series “Barbarians”. “Today” asked him for an interview.

After “Dark” and “How To Sell Drugs online … fast”, Netflix has the next promising German series in its program. We are talking about the six-part historical epic “Barbarians” (starting on November 23), which takes place in the year 9 AD, when the Teutons were subjugated by the Romans.

The focus is on three Germanic childhood friends who meet again in adulthood. One of them is Arminius, who is supposed to fight for the Romans and thus gets into a moral dilemma. Austro star Laurence Rupp (“You will be dead in 3 days”) slips into this role.

Plastic slaughter

The shooting was not entirely safe, like Rupp im “Today”-Talk reveals. Even though both the armor and the swords were made of plastic. “You can still hurt yourself with it. We trained and practiced so much that it didn’t actually happen. There were a few bruises, but that’s part of it,” said the native Viennese. Rupp himself was almost responsible for an accident: “It was close for me once. It was my own fault. The horse went in the wrong direction.” In the end everything turned out well.

Rupp about hate postings

How the series will be received by viewers remains to be seen. If there are any nasty comments, the Austrian knows how to deal with them. “If something should happen, you have to look at it first. That people don’t like something is part of it. You have to endure it. It just depends on the tone in which criticism is made. For me it is It is definitely important to maintain your own attitude, but that does not mean that you have to answer every criticism. “

That’s how Rupp is with the corona crisis

Rupp has survived the corona crisis quite well so far. It wasn’t until August that he stood in front of the camera at Jürgen Vogel’s side for the film adaptation of the novel “Forever Dead”, staged by Harald SICHERITZ. The 33-year-old is still worried about his job: “I enjoy being with my family and being a dad at home. But without my job, I’m not quite me.” He explains that it’s not so much about finance. “It’s about me. I want to tell something and get out of myself. I have to give up my energy somewhere,” said the actor.

Trailer for “Barbarians”

Series that you have to see

Nav-AccountCreated with Sketch. lm TimeCreated with Sketch.21.10.2020, 16:34| Akt: 22.10.2020, 09:42

.

This is what a war in space would look like – Science

How can one imagine a war scenario in space from the current point of view? Are satellites used for military purposes?

So warlike and exciting, with fast, alternating and unpredictable maneuvers like in the cult works of film art, “Star Wars” and “Star Trek”, it should not look like that in space in the foreseeable future – should a state of war arise. A regulation has now been published for this.

One MessageAccording to the Aerospace Corporation, there are physical limitations and combat ships – like those from the science fiction classics – are not yet an option.

If there is a conflict in orbit, the following points should be considered: satellites are fast but predictable, space is large, timing is everything, and satellites are slow to maneuver.

Satellites are not fighter jets

Satellites reach speeds of three to eight kilometers per second. However, the fact that they will have to return to orbit at some point makes their maneuvers predictable. A satellite also has more difficulty changing direction than an airplane on Earth. Every change in position requires a change in height.

How big is space?

Space is too big so it doesn’t make sense to try to conquer an area. The space between low earth orbit and geostationary earth orbit is 200 trillion cubic kilometers, which is 190 times the volume of the earth.

Timing is everything

The warfare would have to be thought of as a game of chess. You could try ramming one satellite with another. That would work by crossing the orbits of two satellites and intercepting them. That requires perfect timing.

Space Chess Championship

A surprise attack would be most successful. However, the nations monitor their satellites well. Since the satellites would have to budget for the fuel for maneuvers, a war scenario could resemble a game of chess. The attacker acts, the defender reacts. A game that could last for days or weeks.

From the ground one could intervene by blocking signals from the target satellite, trying to send false commands or imitating the control signal from the owner. Another scenario is conceivable: In cyber warfare, the hacking of a satellite or the ground station, incorrect information could be transmitted.

Nav-AccountCreated with Sketch. ga TimeCreated with Sketch.19.10.2020, 18:29| Akt: 19.10.2020, 18:29

.

Brexit and EU: “No Deal” is possible

The summit in Brussels does not bring about an agreement in the trade dispute with Great Britain. Although the ultimatum is running out, negotiations should continue.

The British Prime Minister has already left the EU. Will there be a deal now? Foto: Aaron Chown/Wire/dpa

BRUSSELS taz | Nine months after Brexit, Great Britain is preparing for a “no deal” and thus a hard break in the trade dispute with the EU. There can only be an agreement if the EU changes its stance “fundamentally”, said British Prime Minister Boris Johnson in London on Friday. However, he did not slam the door for talks, despite a British ultimatum expired on October 15.

The EU is also trying to find a deal. “As planned, our negotiating team will go to London next week to intensify the negotiations,” wrote Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Twitter on Friday. “The EU is still working on a deal, but not at any price.” Chancellor Angela Merkel made a similar statement at the EU summit in Brussels.

“An agreement would be in the interests of both sides,” said Merkel after the two-day summit meeting. “Time is of the essence here, too.” The 27 heads of state and government had previously tried to push the ball into the British field. After a tightly screened debate, they called on London to “take the necessary steps to enable an agreement”.

London reacted coldly. On Thursday evening, the British chief negotiator, David Frost, criticized the EU for misappropriating the tone and not offering more intensive negotiations. This raised concerns in Brussels that Britain could break off talks on Friday. It didn’t come to that.

Several times taken by surprise

“Come here, come to us – if there are fundamental changes in your position,” said the British Prime Minister, who has taken the EU by surprise several times with changes of position and ultimatums. The EU summit was not “very encouraging”. If the EU does not change its position, it will probably not be possible to reach an agreement.

Three areas in particular are still disputed. The EU calls for a “level playing field” in tax, wage and environmental policy, ie fair competition without dumping. Great Britain wants to break away from the EU rules and also make aid for Northern Ireland possible. There is also a dispute over who would monitor a trade deal and punish violations. In addition, both sides are fighting over fishing.

France in particular is demanding safe access to British fishing grounds. Head of State Emmanuel Macron rejected the impression that he could let a deal fail for that reason alone. “We argue about everything,” said Macron after the summit in Brussels.

But the EU leaders are not only at odds with London. There is also trouble with the European Parliament – because of the future EU budget and climate protection. Merkel refused to reopen the budget negotiated in July and to enter into negotiations with parliament. In her role as EU Council President, she also ensured that climate protection was postponed.

55 percent reduction

The Commission had proposed that the CO2– Reduce emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030, instead of just 40 percent. The EU Parliament even demands 60 percent fewer emissions. However, the heads of state and government did not commit themselves at their meeting. This is a mistake, said the Green MEP Sven Giegold of the taz. “We cannot save the climate with adjournments,” he warns.

Giegold calls for a special summit so that the new EU climate law comes into force in 2020. “It is risky to wait until the next EU summit in December,” said Lutz Weischer from the Germanwatch organization. The EU risked slowing down the dynamic on climate issues.

.

The truth: asylum seekers in space

British Home Secretary Priti Patel has an idea how the motherland of democracy could keep refugees at bay: Distant islands.

The British empire has shrunk, but there are still a few remote corners. What do you do with it? Britain’s Interior Minister Priti Patel had an idea: You could just park asylum seekers on Ascension Island in the South Atlantic. The brittle volcanic island is more than 6,400 kilometers from the motherland of democracy – so far enough that these foreigners could not disturb anyone. The Royal Air Force attacked the Argentine bases on the Malwinen from there during the Falklands War in 1982.

St. Helena would also be an option, said Patel. The English had exiled Napoleon there after he lost the battle of Waterloo. He is said to have died of cancer on the island in 1821. Some scientists claim that he was poisoned on the orders of the English government. St. Helena would have the advantage of being even further from Great Britain than Ascension Island. The American entomologist EO Wilson once described the island as “only one step away from a satellite colony in space”.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has already called many bangbang bags into his cabinet so that he himself appears in a better light, but with Patel he shot the ball. She is more racist than all the racists in the Tory party, even if she claims to have been a target of racists in her difficult childhood because of her Indian ancestry.

Last year she made a suggestion on how to force the annoying Irish to give way in the Brexit negotiations. As experts had predicted food shortages in the event of a hard Brexit, the resourceful minister said that the Irish could be threatened with famine. Apparently, Patel did not know that the English government had already caused a famine in Ireland by the mid-19th century by exporting huge quantities of meat and grain from the Irish colony that would have been enough to avoid the disaster.

This time, however, the cabinet refused to starve the Irish, and it did not play along with the banishment of asylum seekers to the Atlantic Islands. But Britain owns more than 900 islands. One can be found there. It shouldn’t be particularly comfortable, you don’t have to pamper people, otherwise you won’t get rid of them.

The bass rock would be ideal for Patel’s purposes. It is uninhabited and is two kilometers off the Scottish coast. In the 15th century, Jacob I had already banished people who were not pleasant to him to the skirt, and in the 17th century it served as a prison. The Isle of Dogs, the dog island, would be even better. It’s just a peninsula, but it’s in the East End of London, almost within sight of the government district. So Priti Patel could keep an eye on the uninvited guests.

The truth on taz.de

.