Arsene Wenger: “The importance of money has become ever greater” | Champions League | Arsenal | Super League | FOOTBALL-INTERNATIONAL

Arsene Wenger is remembered for his historical past as technical director of the Arsenal. This makes him an authorized voice to speak of the reality of football internationally. For this reason, I do not hesitate to testify about the current situation due to the appearance of the project of the Superliga and showed his complete opposition to the idea.

“I would say, basically and personally, that I am against the Superliga because it ignores what makes football great ”, explained in ‘beINSports’ the former coach of the Arsenal.

The former technical director of Arsenal He also stated that “the importance of money has become ever greater.” This generates a loss in football that could no longer be classified as a different sport.

“You always have to know if that is the majority. We live in a society where protesters are not always the majority. The media only consider the minority of the protesters. Soccer is unpredictable as a sport, but money and the recruitment of the best players by a small number of clubs has made it more predictable, “he added.

To end this argument, Wenger cited the current semifinals of the Champions League. For him, the issue of money seems to be paramount in this type of tournaments and the teams dazzle with a large amount of money that allows them the opportunity to sign better players and reinforce their squad with proposals that are difficult to reject in attempts to achieve objectives. greater.

“There are basically the four richest clubs in the world: Chelsea, Manchester City, PSG and Real Madrid. And they have practically the same thing every year. That means that for clubs like Nottingham Forest, Aston Villa … it’s over for good ”, he concluded.

Receive our newsletter: we will send you the best sports content, as Depor always does.




How many women’s Champions League did Real Madrid win?

The merengue team wants to reach second position to be able to compete with the best in Europe for the first time.

Real Madrid is close to completing a historic season. The white box seeks to snatch the second position from Levante to confirm itself as an alternative to Barcelona and thus ensure its pass to the Champions League.

A competition that the white team has not yet stepped on. In its first season with the Real Madrid name, the team from the capital of Spain has shown improvement in all areas and that has allowed it to fight for the first time in its history to access the highest continental competition.

A big step forward for a debutant team

Third with 57 points in the Primera Iberdrola, the merengue team is surprising locals and strangers. After the signings of Kenti Robles, Teresa Abelleira or Ivana Andrés, added to the experience of Asllani or Jakobsson, the white box has managed to make a compact box.

A spider web that, at the moment, is giving a lot of success to a Real Madrid that seeks to finish the season in the best possible way, and in this way, to be able to compete for the first time with the best of the Old Continent.


The US owners of English clubs seek a golden goal | Opinion

In soccer, a golden goal gave automatic victory in a match. The American owners of Arsenal, Manchester United and Liverpool thought they had found the financial equivalent in the Super League. With that plan in shambles, Stan Kroenke, the Glazer family, and John Henry lack a reliable plan B.

One of the attractions of the Super League was the opportunity to control costs. Revenues have been reduced during the pandemic, and many clubs have racked up losses. Money from lucrative national television broadcast deals has also stopped growing.

The introduction of a US-style sports cartel would have allowed for new income from the media, while at the same time allowing owners to put a cap on player salaries and transfers, keeping more of it for themselves. The plan could have quadrupled Manchester United’s operating profit, according to our calculations.

Now that the Super League has imploded, owners have the option to unilaterally cut costs. They could follow an overloaded version of the strategy started by the Glazers, who tend to extract large dividends from Manchester United rather than invest fresh money.

But clubs that spend less tend to attract fewer stars, play worse, and risk losing revenue from lucrative European tournaments. Financial constraints only work in the unlikely event that rivals follow suit.

Another option is to sell. Spotify Technology founder Daniel Ek says he wants to buy Arsenal. The Glazers would be willing to sell Manchester United for 4 billion pounds (4.6 billion euros), according to recent press reports. Many fans, outraged by the Super League fiasco, are eager to lose sight of their club owners.

However, meeting valuation expectations seems complicated. The price of the Glazers is almost double the current business value of the club, which is listed in New York: 2.4 billion pounds (2.8 billion euros). For his part, Arsenal’s Kroenke would likely expect a premium over the valuation of 1.8 billion (2.1 billion) that his 2018 purchase from minorities represented. However, if the multiple of Manchester United’s future income is applied to Arsenal’s pre-pandemic turnover, it follows that the London club is only worth 1.6 billion (1.8 billion).

Cash-rich trophy hunters, probably the natural owners of soccer teams, are in short supply. Major investors from Abu Dhabi and Qatar already own Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain, respectively. The Chinese capitalists have mostly withdrawn. Aside from Ek, the tech billionaires seem uninterested.

The golden goal rule was only used a handful of times in the big tournaments before the authorities removed it. American owners of British clubs have similarly little chance of financial salvation.

The authors are columnists for Reuters Breakingviews. Opinions are yours. The translation, of Carlos Gomez Down, it is the responsibility of Five days


Boris Johnson’s swerve about the Superliga that is outrageous in the United Kingdom comes to light

The manager would have given the go-ahead to United to, hours later, position themselves against the tournament.

In the trajectory of Boris Johnson Several characteristics that define him stand out, but one of that stands out: the ability to survive in politics and translate circumstances into opportunities to win popular support. Since he ran for mayor of London – a position he held from 2008 to 2016 – and until he assumed the reins of the Bhe ruled, the British Prime Minister has exhibited an extraordinary ability to navigate, without sinking, in all kinds of swells. With the management of the coronavirus as its main stumbling block.

In these weeks of football frenzy, this journalist born in New York (United States) has managed to catapult himself into public opinion in the United Kingdom thanks to his leading role in the battle against the Superliga European and in favor of Premier League, one of the emotional jewels of the island population. His work has been well known to convince the six clubs involved in the revolutionary competition – Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Tottenham, Manchester United and Manchester City – of the forced return to the fold.

A call from you immediately seduced the directors of these sports entities. He threatened to use the disconnection with the European Union to torpedo the hiring of foreign footballers and apply the legislation in order to penalize rebellion. That maneuver, the social pressure of the thousands of fans who spoke out in the streets and social networks, and the frontal confrontation with UEFA would end up undoing the project promoted by Florentino Pérez and Andrea Agnelli. In 48 hours.

But in a story of such a transcendental dimension as it is the case, in the hangover of the hurricane the ins and outs that help to understand what happened tend to be dusted off. And in this informative section, a conversation has come to light that has come to undermine the immaculate and patriotic image that Johnson had managed to build for himself. As a champion and defender of the deep-rooted British traditions that coalesce with domestic football.

The newspaper ‘The Times‘has been in charge of publishing the meeting that the prime minister held that Ed Woodward, Executive Vice President of United, ten days before the announcement of the creation of the Super League. In that talk, as has been leaked, the ‘premier‘he assured the leader of the’Red Devils‘which had him support of your Government in promoting the new-minded tournament. Thus, the contradiction with the stance verbalized by the conservative president since the competition was presented has set fire to the national political future with controversy.

So far has the dimension of this kind of double-sided Johnson come that, according to the newspaper ‘The Guardian’, the opposition is going to demand that he be accountable to the Parliament. That conversation with Woodward – who is resigning as manager of the Old Trafford club in June – has launched Labor. One of its visible heads, Jo Stevens, has stated this: “Again, the integrity of Boris Johnson is in question. The people have the right to know what was promised to Manchester United by those responsible and by the prime minister. If Johnson supported the Super League and then turned his back on the plan, then the British people deserve a full, clear and immediate explanation. And an apology. “

It will be scrutinized to clarify what they talked about, why he met with the United manager, who else shared that appointment with them and if Johnson or any of his colleagues in the Executive have seen any of the questioned teams. Downing Street has limited itself to communicating that they are in no way known that the leader had scheduled a meeting with Woodward. Rather, they add, they passed each other in a corridor casually.

At halftime, the flow of reactions to the eclipse of the Super League does not slow down. The newspaper ‘Daily Mail’ has uncovered that the English clubs offered the leaders of the disputed continental tournament some conditions to continue in the project. Measures such as expand the number of invitations from five to nine, in order to provide a patina of meritocracy to the competition. Real Madrid, Juventus, Barcelona, ​​Atlético, Milan and Inter refused. And, it has also been published that the WhatsApp group between the teams and the company that manages the communication of the Super League (iNHouse) has been frozen. Not a word has been said since City and Chelsea made their escape from the ship official.

On the other hand, the open wound within the football has crystallized: the Italian Football Federation (FIGC) has approved a forceful regulation against the groups that participate in the newly created event. “Those who follow (in the Super League) will be punished (…) In order to register for the league, the club agrees not to participate in competitions organized by private associations and not recognized by FIFA, UEFA and FIGC. That participation would lead to decline of the affiliation “, it is affirmed. Its Federal Council gave the go-ahead and Juve and the Milan giants already know that if they continue in the group of the 12 founding clubs They will not be able to compete in Serie A or in the Coppa.

Those who are still there will be punished, also with the exclusion of international competitions. With Ceferin we agreed from the beginning and I was impacted by his way of involving the political forces “, has been sentenced from the federation, while it has been known that Aleksandr Ceferin – UEFA president – has eaten with Joan Laporta Y Gerard Piqué. The racial station ‘RAC-1′ has specified that the reason for the meeting revolved around the distribution of television rights.

It should be remembered that Ceferin has said of the group of rebel entities -among which is Barça- that they are ruled by presidents that “they think the Earth is flat and they think the Super League still exists“And that is not for jokes. After repeatedly sliding the veracity of the possibility of expelling from the Champions League those who have challenged UEFA, the Slovenian lawyer has addressed the players in this way:” Always there may be fewer games, but also the salaries of the coaches and players have to adapt. You cannot generate less and earn more all the time. “This is how he has responded to the complaints about the overcrowding of games that will worsen if the new Champions League is implemented – which will increase the number of games, since it will go from 32 to 36 participating teams-.


Condemned to understand each other

Much has been said this week about the media earthquake that caused the irruption of the Super League, but a more restrained analysis of why this point has been reached is needed. It is not the first time that there is a hint of rebellion within football. I mean past attempts to organize a league of the Benelux between Holland and Belgium or the idea of ​​incorporating Celtic Y Rangers to the Premier League. They were initiatives that affected domestic championships and that did not necessarily satisfy all the parties involved. But this time we are not talking about an ‘attack’ on a local league, but on the format of European competitions as we know it today. In basketball, a similar movement was made with the Euroleague, we already have a precedent, but football moves in other economic and sentimental parameters.

From the outset, we must take into account several factors that explain the discontent of the clubs that have chosen to seek an alternative on their own and at risk: economic problems exacerbated by the pandemic on a global scale, the tax burden, particularly in Spain, and, in other cases, poor management. These teams are generally uneasy with the current business model.

In the case of the entities that have opted for the Super League, more dependent on attendance at stadiums and merchandising, this concern has led them to a desperate movement that could go through a dialogue solution or an instantaneous separation, as has happened. finally, driven by the Covid-19 crisis. Each had their reasoning, but it has undoubtedly been seen as a sudden move that has led to considerable collateral damage. Among other reasons, because the communication of the project has been very deficient, if not nonexistent. The times and the arguments have been marked by an excess of exasperation.

And English fans have taken to the streets because in their traditional football culture they do not like a foreign owner to give such a sudden turn of the wheel. They do not want inventions now that the time to return to the stadiums is approaching. The message of the Super League has not permeated because it has been sold as an exclusion when the fan does not conceive of football in any other way than for the merit gained on the field with the push of the stands. In that sense, Barça has not given the impression of wanting to impose its criteria by giving the partner the right to decide.

Even so, the solution must go through dialogue, because the brake on the Super League has not eliminated the underlying problems. After the upheaval of the last few days, all parties have a much higher mountain to climb to find a way out. But the Champions it needs historic clubs and those clubs will again look for solutions to alleviate their discontent. The UEFA and the members of the Super League are condemned to understand each other.

I LIKE: Barça adds and continues. The victory against Villarreal, with a comeback and a match suffered, left mixed feelings but shows that the Barça he is prepared to suffer in this final stretch of the season. That is the way, take each game as a final to continue depending on himself to aspire to the league title. Exciting days are coming.

I DO NOT LIKE IT: El Godó with an audience, La Liga with empty stadiums. It is difficult for the ordinary citizen to understand. It is true that each competition is governed differently, but the contrast does not help to calm the patience of the fan eager to return to cheer on his team. We hope that next season the criteria will be equal and the pandemic will take a back seat if vaccination advances, as we hope.


the day Paris, London, Rome and Berlin kicked the ‘Super League’

The twelve clubs that threatened to create a European ‘Super League’ entered 6,400 million euros before the pandemic. A year later, the figure was reduced to 5.568 million, 13% less. This difference is what It has collapsed the football foundations of Europe, in addition to plunging the governments of the great capitals of the continent into confusion. Fear has spread among the twelve giants of the ball who fear how the pandemic can radically change a business touched to death by the effects of the Covid, but also by the bubble in which the art of football has lived for five years.

Soccer is one more component of the complex network of interests that play on the international scene, both for its impressive economic data and for its social strength. Only in our country generates 549 million euros in television rights, 129 million in tickets and more than 180,000 direct jobs, to which should be added another 838,000 indirect. Nor can we forget its fiscal contribution: 4,100 million, 75% of the budget allocated to education in the Kingdom of Spain.

But in addition to these magnitudes, the world of soccer handles another much more complex and powerful variable: geopolitics. This is what makes this sport transcend the field of play to become a social and political phenomenon. This is the only way to understand that the prime ministers of the most important countries in Europe can unite on the same day against a project called to completely revolutionize football competitions, at least as we know them today.

The cake is so huge that has made European football the target of great fortunes and Arab, Chinese and even American investment funds. A fresh money that, in some cases, serves to wash off large debts and that, in others, seeks to build teams from scratch with the capacity to compete with the big ones. Winning on the pitch, playing in the senior league.

London: Johnson ‘the Fast’

The government of Boris Johnson he was the first to turn around. Paradoxically, the English league contributed six clubs to the Super League: Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City, Manchester United, Liverpool y Tottenham Hotspur.

A small X-ray of the British football team shows us that only the owner of the Manchester City, Mansour bin Zeyed Al Nahayan, has the backing of the powerful Abu Dhabi Investment Group, an Emirati fund with sufficient capacity to undertake football projects anywhere in the world. The rest are owned by fortunes like Stan Kroenke’s Arsenal, Abramovich of the Chelsea, the Glazer family in the Liverpool and the Lindsell Train Corporation, owner of the Manchester United. A priori, London should be in favor of creating a competition that would provide stability to its star teams. However, the English league hides much of the investment of Arab and North American funds in mid-range teams.

The Leicester City was the subject of a purchase by Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha’s, a Thai billionaire in 2010. The Wolverhampton Wanderers suffered the landing of the Chinese investment fund Fosun International in 2016 and a large part of the clubs registered in the Premier League have participation of American, Chinese or Arab investment funds or billionaires.

If the Super League goes ahead, all of these clubs, including their multi-million dollar investment, would be blown up by having their participation vetoed in a competition in which at least 15 of the 20 places would already be occupied. In addition to pressure on the streets from City fans, the only English club team in the ‘Super League’ with the participation of a fund, Downing Street had to deal with calls and calls for attention from minor clubs participated by funds from foreign investment, to the unison cry of: “Johnson, where are my millions?”

France: Macron ‘the meritorious’

If there was a statement that detonated the league of the greats, it was that of the French president, Emmanuelle Macron. The ‘Super League’ “(…) threatens the principle of solidarity and sporting merit”. The French leader was in the eye of the hurricane, since the PSG he had not yet explicitly adhered to the rebellion of the giants. The club is owned by Nasser Al-Khelaïfi, belonging to the sovereign wealth fund Qatar Investment Autohority. Khelaïfi maintains a personal and budgetary crusade to win a Champions League at any cost. It is estimated that, in the last 10 years, the oil magnate has been able to spend more than 1 billion euros on building a team to lift the European cup. Only in Neymar the Qatari pawned 220 million euros.

France seems to be the center of attention of the big millionaire movements of Arab funds interested in soccer. A less competitive championship makes the investments required to acquire a club less. In the last 5 years there have been more than 15 acquisitions of soccer teams by foreign capital in the neighboring country. Thus, 20% of Lyon, by IDG Capital Partners of China, or the Bordeaux, by General American, are the last examples of the storming of the French Bastille. Macron, like Johnson, knew that PSG’s step forward would be an obstacle for other top French teams to dream of competing with the great European powers. Nothing better than putting out the fire before it breaks out.

Rome: ‘Supermario’ al ataque

Ten hours. That was the period of time that passed between the night of the ‘Super League’ statement and his funeral by ‘Supermario’ Draghi. In your case, “preserve national competitions, the values ​​of meritocracy and the social function of sport”Were the arguments made. Curious linguistic coincidence with their French and British counterparts. His words put an end to the aspirations of the Juventus, Inter Y Milan for extinguishing its bulky debt and enjoying the rain of millions provided by JP Morgan: 7,000 million.

Although in the last decade the role of Italian clubs is light years ahead of the successes they starred in the 90s, Italy continues to be the birthplace of football for many investment groups, both for its history and for the record held by the ‘azzurri’.

The ‘Italianness’ of football is reflected in the fact that only 5 of the 20 first division clubs are in foreign hands. Friedkin, an American financial group, acquired 86.6% of the Roma for 780 million euros, following in the wake of other Italian-American businessmen who bought the Bologna o la Fiorentina. As he Inter As the Milan, two Italian representatives in the ‘Superliga’, have foreign ownership.

In the case of Inter, Italian ‘pasta’ was also loved in China. Suning Group bought 68.55% of the club in 2016 for 270 million. For its part, the Milanese derby is completed with the participation of the US investment fund Elliot Capital, thanks to the purchase of debt acquired from the previous owner. Reasons more than enough for Draghi to try to ensure at all costs the homeland essence of Calcio, preventing foreign investment from going to a ‘Super League’ with clear private overtones.

Berlin: Merkel ‘the absent’

Germany is not an option for foreign investors. The 50 + 1 law gives club members half the shares plus one, something that gives fans control of the club’s property. This rule makes teams like him Bayer Munich, the Borussia Dortmund or the Schalke 04 have 290,000, 153,000 and 150,688 people with the right to speak and vote in their respective assemblies. An organizational hell, but with shareholder stability as a counterpart.

This fact is what explains why the German executive has kept silent, unlike the big European capitals. Without the foreign presence, protests have come solely from the Bundesliga, a whole institution in the Germanic country. A simple statement warning of the need for “football should always be about sporting performance and not about the selfish financial interests of a few clubs”, Served the body chaired by Christian Seifert to dispatch the matter. End of quote.

Madrid: Pedro ‘the elusive’

For its part, the position of the Spanish Government has been really timid on this matter. The initial silence was followed by statements by the Secretary of State for Sports and the Minister of Culture calling for the understanding between the two parties in conflict: UEFA and the Super League.

Spanish football lives in a multimillion dollar debt bubble that can burst at any moment. The value of the Spanish first division teams takes them away, for the moment, from the hands of foreign investment funds. To get an idea, the average value of a first-class Spanish team is 33% lower than an English one, but approximately double that of an Italian one.

The economic brake removes the presence of foreign funds or companies from the greats of La Liga. However, both the Second Division and some top teams have been and are in their sights. The Rastar Group Chinese bought the Spanish for 150 million euros in 2015. Peter Lim acquired 70% of the Valencia for 94 million euros, Chinese Link International Sports bought the Granada for 37 million euros and the Chinese group Wanda bought 20% of the Atlético de Madrid for 45 million euros, shares that were later sold in 2018 to the Israelis of Quantum Pacific.

In total, the Spanish League adds more than 500 million euros in foreign investments, a cake too sweet – and to be amortized – to which a large part of these teams would have to resign in case the ‘Super League’ went ahead.

Few things can be more emotional than soccer. While political parties struggle to gather a few hundred people at each rally, soccer teams are capable of gathering thousands, tens of thousands of fans every Sunday. Or at least it was just a year and a half ago, and this is the great fear that grips football Europe: that things will never be the same again.

In this, Florentino Pérez is not wrong. Football will not be the same after the pandemic. The large operators of the future, such as Netflix or Amazon, need to offer much more to an American, Arab or Asian viewer than a match that ends in a draw between a large team and a small one. Anyway, the white president now thinks it would be easier change the rules of football and make it more attractive instead of trying to change UEFA on which Platini built his Church. And it is that football is a spectacle: that of the ‘Super League’ of extraordinary clubs.


The European Super League takes the idea of ​​globalization to extremes

Few signals in Spain. The minister responsible for sports was dispatched referring to procedural issues together with the need for a dialogue between the parties. The Government, in principle, washes its hands. Unfortunately, neither the Madrid or Barcelona fans have said this mouth is mine. Compliance and submission to the orders of their presidents.

The UK, always an example of maximum liberalism where governments do not intervene in the business world, has said no. Boris Johnson, like the fans, have been adamant against the sports elites. Rejection of the initiative of the club owners – John Henry at Liverpool or the Glazer family at Manchester United – backed by a line of credit from JP Morgan Chase of 3.25 billion euros. The British government and fans have reversed the contemporary neoliberal tradition.

Soccer is more than just a club. It is the fans and their followers who make it up. A draw flag for those youngsters with soccer skills with the potential to become one of the squad.

The North American members of the British clubs and the financial burdens of Spanish and Italian clubs have been the engine of this new initiative based on their structure of the American leagues. The European Super League would even have, as happens in the United States, control elements: a ceiling for salaries and a limit on expenses.

Would the cost of the new works at the Bernabéu-Chamartín fall within those limits? Probably and surely not. Wouldn’t the Catalan independentistas see that this is a viable project to avoid playing in the Spanish league, retain Messi, who would never play a Catalan league, and, naturally, clean up their more than battered finances? Gerona or Espanyol, Getafe or Leganés, would no longer be first-rate Catalans or Madrid!

The current Champions League would disappear and with it the incentive to participate. It is not only now about winning the League but about qualifying for Europe. Geographically limited Basque, Galician or Andalusian fans and Madrid or Catalan fans who cannot afford a plane ticket would have to submit to many hours on the bus to see their loved ones.

The tradition of soccer as a national sport would eventually disappear. One more television show. Memories of that time when there was a quota of foreigners to play the European leagues. Globalization has been winning. The argument has even prevailed that excellent foreign players would be a stimulus for nationals.

So bravo for globalization, even if it means the depopulation of the Argentine or Brazilian leagues; either for Madrid, Barcelona or PSG and less well for the Argentine River or the Brazilian Palmeiras.

A reconversion of European football carried out and exploited by money is not a factor of social cohesion, as football has been, but is a blatant robbery against traditions and fans. I have good and intelligent friends who agree with Florentino and Laporta and who naturally are contrary to my “provincial” football opinions.


The fourth industrial revolution of football

There are those who these days wave the original football flag, as if it were a static photo that has never evolved. “Blame capitalism!”, Cry out social networks who have achieved overthrow the Super League in less than 48 hours. But it is enough to review the history books to realize that the football-business binomial has always existed, perhaps now exploited to limits that no one imagined. Nor did anyone, in the 1930s, think that in a stadium there would be 90,000 people paying for a ticket or televisions paying to broadcast games. Over time.

The feeling of helplessness felt today by the leagues of countries with low populations or the clubs of the middle class is the same as the creators of football Among the elites of London they began to feel when the industrialists of the north of England began to professionalize their players masquerading as factory employees. It is a journey that we relate in the book Football and business: from grass to Monopoly, where we see how practically every fifty years there is a revolution.

Now we are in the disruption that digital platforms and the new businesses they allow are causing. Apart from television, being able to broadcast daily content on social networks has allowed the great European giants to aspire to have a truly global presence. And there, as we have seen these days, they have plenty of games that they consider minor. However, only twelve teams – now only six – have dared to shake up the system to be able to sign life insurance that protects them from being left out of the elite in the new era. Nobody wants to follow in the footsteps of Ajax, Anderlecht, Benfica, Celtic, Red Star, Steaua de Bucharest… They have already succumbed to the change in the business model, a path that Barça and Real Madrid do not want to travel.

Sunday’s ordeal probably won’t materialize in a club-owned Super League, but no one thinks the game is over. The debate is already on the table and it is likely that it will end up being translated into a new model for managing competitions. The bottom line of the question, beyond how much money each one keeps, is more philosophical: who has the key to the box. And there will be the workhorse.

The Kobe Bryant brand will no longer be just Nike

The contract that united the former NBA player with the multinational expired this week and the family of the deceased athlete has resigned to sign a life agreement. Nike may continue to use the Sheath logo they created alongside Kobe, but not his name.

Be careful with the future of Second B

It is not the Super League, but the requirements that the new Rfef competition will demand as a prelude to LaLiga are close to it in relation to the capabilities of many clubs. Stadiums for 4,000 people, guarantee of 200,000 euros and professional management. In favor.


The 50 + 1 rule or why German clubs are owned by the fans

The 50 + 1 rule was the threat used by the government of Boris Johnson to make the English clubs abandon the Super League project who had just been born. Johnson threatened to prevent foreign owners from owning more than 50 percent of a club’s ownership inspired by the norm that has been in force in Germany for years.

When the German clubs began to transform into joint-stock companies, In 1998, this 50 + 1 rule was established, which establishes that a club must keep 50 percent plus one of its shares owned by the club and its members to be able to register for the Bundesliga.

“The rule is designed to ensure that club members retain overall control, protecting clubs from the influence of outside investors.”, dice the Bundesliga itself on its website.

In this way it is impossible for a German club to fall into the hands of a sheikh or any billionaire, as it happens in the Premier and in many other leagues, including the Spanish one. And the club’s relationship with its fans is guaranteed.


Real Madrid, Atlético and Barça must apply to the RFEF for the license to participate in the Champions League next season


Act. a las 10:42


So much FC Barcelona What Real Madrid Y Atlético de Madrid They must request their Champions League license from the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) before May 15.

This is an essential requirement if they want to participate in UEFA competitions next season, that is, a mandatory procedure every season for all those Spanish clubs that wish to be in Europe, as long as they meet the qualifying requirements.

Last March was when The RFEF communicated to the Spanish clubs the opening of the period to request the UEFA license to participate in the 2020-2021 club competitions: Champions and Europa League. Request that now takes on more importance after what happened in recent days.

The first procedure the RFEF UEFA Licensing Department

The first procedure to grant this license is the RFEF UEFA First Instance Committee, which is the one who must decide whether to accept or deny it. Decision to be made before May 15.

Once they give the ok to the licenses of the Spanish clubs that request it, you must send it to UEFA before May 31. And among them the logical thing is that they have the license of Real Madrid, Barcelona and Atlético de Madrid. If it should be explained that Spanish clubs always meet these requirements season after season.

This season some exceptional requirements for COVID

All clubs must meet a series of requirements that this time have been lightened as a result of COVID. On 12 February 2021, the UEFA Executive Committee adopted a series of additional measures in light of the current impact that COVID-19 is having on European club football, in relation to the UEFA Licensing procedure for the season. 2021/22.

Two of these are particularly important: the modification of the club licensing criteria to provide future financial information in relation to the going concern principle and the modification of the assessment of past due debts for club licensing. . Measures that UEFA itself made official in a circular on February 15.

Changes that the UEFA Executive Committee has decided to modify solely with regard to participation in UEFA club competitions in the 2021/22 season. Changes where the highest body of European football is aware of the impact that COVID is having on the economy of the clubs.

Changes that the RFEF just communicated in mid-March to the Spanish league clubs in order to request that license from UEFA.

In our country it is common for this license to be requested by about 14 of the 20 clubs in the highest category. Only those who are in a more complicated situation due to classification, usually do not carry out the procedures.

As a clarification, the measures indicated by UEFA in its communication refer to two specific situations:

On the one hand, with regard to the annual accounts and interim financial statements, it will not be necessary to provide prospective financial information if the auditor’s report contains a paragraph of emphasis or material uncertainty about the application of the going concern principle. . For the evaluation of the granting of the license, it will only be analyzed if there is a qualification in the report related to the application of said accounting principle. In other words, the sole security of the club’s present and future viability is sufficient to grant the license.

On the other hand, regarding the absence of debts with employees, Tax Agency and Social Security, if there are outstanding debts as of March 31, 2021, the club may be granted the license if and only if:

1.- The total amount of outstanding debts as of March 31, 2021 is not greater than fifteen percent of total personnel expenses, according to the latest audited annual accounts.

2.- And the applicant Club presents, together with the reports indicated in article 80.4bis, a payment plan for outstanding debts, in which they are paid no later than June 30, 2021

Acceptance of this license implies that Spanish clubs, starting with the three affected, assume the requirements set by UEFA for their competitions.