Sunday, 12 July 2026 Newsarchy UK live index
NewsarchyUKUK
Every UK story. Mapped, sourced, and explained where it matters.
Business

Elon Musk sides with Apple in trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI

Elon Musk has supported Apple in its trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI, which alleges the theft of proprietary hardware secrets and designs. The legal action adds further uncertainty to OpenAI's corporate governance and strategic plans.

Elon Musk sides with Apple in trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI
Elon Musk sides with Apple in trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI

Tensions between major figures in the technology sector have escalated sharply this week following a legal action initiated by Apple. The ongoing professional and personal conflict between Elon Musk and Sam Altman gained new intensity as Musk publicly aligned himself with Apple in its trade secret litigation against OpenAI.

The lawsuit, filed on 10 July, centres on allegations that OpenAI orchestrated the theft of proprietary hardware secrets to facilitate its entry into the consumer device market. According to Apple, the company identified a migration of more than 400 former employees to OpenAI. The filing specifically names former design executive Tang Tan, alleging that Tan instructed recruits to bring genuine components, prototypes, and hardware to meetings to demonstrate the technology to potential colleagues at the AI firm. Apple asserts that the items involved include circuits and designs for unreleased hardware products not yet available to consumers.

Media additions

Image via benzinga.com
Image via benzinga.com

Musk, a co-founder and former financial backer of OpenAI, has utilized the X platform to amplify these allegations. In a series of public exchanges, Musk referred to the OpenAI chief executive as “Scam Altman,” stating, “He’s taken fraud to a whole new level.” Musk further alleged that after transitioning OpenAI away from its original nonprofit structure, the company misappropriated technology belonging to Apple. This public posture follows a history of friction between the two, originating in 2018 when Musk unsuccessfully attempted to take control of the organization.

Public Exchange and Counter-Accusations

The public sparring has extended beyond the legal specifics of the Apple lawsuit. Sam Altman responded to Musk’s recent criticisms by questioning the viability of ventures led by the Tesla and SpaceX chief, specifically targeting plans to establish solar-powered space data centers. Altman suggested these orbital projects are designed to appeal to public market investors. In response, Musk indicated that the first of these units would begin flight operations next year. Musk also quipped, “Maybe you can come see them if your parole officer approves.”

In a separate exchange on X, an observer questioned Altman’s perspective on the legal pressure from Apple. Altman replied, i am not afraid of Apple, but i have tremendous respect for them. s-tier company. This interaction occurred as both organizations continue to compete across several fronts, including model quality, talent acquisition, and computing power, as evidenced by the concurrent release cycles of OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 and xAI’s Grok 4.5.

Legal Context and Market Outlook

The current litigation arrives at a sensitive juncture for OpenAI. The company is managing the ongoing fallout from a separate legal challenge brought by Musk, who sought to revert OpenAI to a nonprofit status. While a jury dismissed that case in May due to filing deadlines, Musk is currently appealing the decision. The new allegations from Apple introduce further uncertainty for the organization’s strategic planning and corporate governance.

Market analysts are monitoring whether the combination of the Apple litigation and the vocal support for the plaintiff from high-profile figures will influence OpenAI’s projected timeline for a public market entry. Concerns regarding the company’s stability have introduced volatility, with market participants closely watching for any official statements from OpenAI executives or board members regarding the company’s internal roadmaps. Additionally, stakeholders are evaluating whether the legal pressure will necessitate adjustments to partnerships or the overall probability of the company meeting its IPO targets by the end of 2026.

Related stories